PETER F. IOCONA - ATTORNEY AT LAW
ORANGE COUNTY'S "BEST" DUI LAWYERS

CALL NOW: 949-305-0343 - FREE CONSULTATION - PAYMENT PLANS

MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS


CONTACT US TODAY


ATTORNEY BIOGRAPHIES


 
CLIENT REVIEWS &
PEER-REVIEW RATINGS



FOLLOW OUR DUI BLOGS


GOOGLE BLOGGER

OC DUI Lawyer Blog


GOOGLE BUSINESS PAGES


PETER F. IOCONA
ATTORNEY AT LAW

22982 LA CADENA DR #239
LAGUNA HILLS, CA. 92653




THE SOCAL LAW NETWORK

23152 VERDUGO DR #201
LAGUNA HILLS, CA. 92653

 



SHARE AND FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:

  


  



ALAN CASTILLO AND PETER F.  IOCONA BOTH SELECTED AS ONE OF ORANGE COUNTY'S TOP-RATED DEFENSE ATTORNEYS

Top-Rated OC DUI Attorney


PETER F. IOCONA: RATED BY "SUPER LAWYERS" 2015-2016


Super Lawyer Rated - Peter F. Iocona


PETER F. IOCONA SELECTED AS ONE OF THE "TOP 100 TRIAL LAWYERS" BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION


Top 100 Trial Lawyers - Peter F. Iocona



PETER F. IOCONA SELECTED AS ONE OF THE TOP CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS





PETER F. IOCONA SELECTED AS ONE OF THE NATION'S TOP ONE PERCENT ATTORNEYS BY N.A.D.C. 


Peter F. Iocona - Top One Percent Rated Attorney


PETER F. IOCONA SELECTED AS A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL ADVOCACY OF DUI DEFENSE


Nationally Ranked Superior DUI Attorney


FEATURED IN THE "TOP 100" MAGAZINE AS ONE OF THE NATION'S TOP 100 LAW FIRMS



 "MEMBER" OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI LAWYERS ASSOCIATION


DUI Defense Lawyer - California DUI Lawyers Association


"MEMBER" OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGE FOR DUI DEFENSE


DUI Lawyer - National College for DUI Defense


"MEMBER" OF THE DUI DEFENSE LAWYERS ASSOCIATION (DUIDLA)


DUI Defense Lawyer - DUIDLA Member

  
ALAN CASTILLO SELECTED AS 
ONE OF THE "TOP 100 TRIAL LAWYERS" BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION



Top 100 Trial Lawyers - Alan Castillo


ALAN CASTILLO SELECTED AS 
ONE OF THE NATION'S TOP ONE PERCENT ATTORNEYS BY N.A.D.C. 


Alan Castillo - Top One Percent Rated Attorney



FORMER CONTRIBUTING EDITORS TO "CALIFORNIA DRUNK DRIVING LAW "
(2003-2016)


California Drunk Driving Law - Contributing Editors (2003-2016)



LAWYER LEGION COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AWARD 


Lawyer Legion - Top Attorney



"LEAD COUNSEL" RATED DEFENSE ATTORNEYS


Lead Counsel Rated Orange County DUI Attorneys



 LAWYER.COM VERIFIED DEFENSE ATTORNEYS





 BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU RATED "A+"


BBB Top Rating - Top-Rated DUI Attorneys



EVERY ATTORNEY IS RATED "10/10" OR "SUPERB" BY AVVO ATTORNEY RATING SERVICE


Peter F. Iocona - Top-Rated Orange County DUI Lawyer

PETER F. IOCONA RATED "SUPERB" "10/10" BY AVVO



Peter F. Iocona - Best Orange County DUI Lawyer

PETER F. IOCONA RECEIVED "CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD" 
FROM AVVO RATING SERVICE


Peter F. Iocona - Top Orange County DUI Attorney

 PETER F. IOCONA AWARDED 
"TOP CONTRIBUTOR" BY AVVO





ALAN CASTILLO RATED "SUPERB" BY AVVO





 
ALAN CASTILLO RECEIVED "CLIENTS' CHOICE AWARD" 
FROM AVVO RATING SERVICE





 MARLO CORDERO RATED
"SUPERB" BY AVVO

MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS

RATED BY SUPER LAWYERS, ORANGE COUNTY'S TOP-RATED DUI DEFENSE ATTORNEYS

Peter F. Iocona - Top 100 Trial LawyersPeter F. Iocona - Super Lawyers Rated Orange County DUI Lawyer  Peter F. Iocona - Top-Rated DUI Criminal Defense Attorney
 Peter F. Iocona - Top-Rated Orange County DUI Defense Attorney

MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS - PENAL CODE SECTION 1535.5

The Fourth Amendment mandates that the following rights apply to all:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Motions to suppress ensure that individual’s Fourth Amendment rights are protected.  In the absence of a warrant, or some type of exigency, an officer needs an objective violation of the law in order to detain an individual, whether on the street or driving. This is usually found through a violation of the vehicle code or some other law. A Motion to suppress, pursuant Penal Code Section 1538.5, allows a defendant to challenge an officer’s proffer of reasonable suspicion.  If granted, everything after the illegal stop is thrown out because the search and seizure is deemed illegal.

In Whren v. United States (1996) 517 U.S. 806 the Supreme Court held that, in the absence of a warrant, an officer must see an objective violation of the law, or have reasonable suspicion that a crime is about to occur or has occurred, before an officer may detain an individual.  An officer’s subjective intentions are irrelevant.  An objective violation must be articulated.  In Heien v. North Carolina (2015) 135 S.Ct. 530, the Supreme Court re-iterated the “objectively reasonable standard” stating that even a mistake of law must be objectively reasonable.

Because an arrest without a warrant is presumptively illegal, the burden at a motion to suppress rests upon the prosecution to prove the warrantless stop was legally justified. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 367 U.S. 643; People v Williams (1999) 20 Cal.4th 119.  In People v. Dowdy (1975) 50 Cal.App. 3d 180 at 183, the court held that "The rule forbidding the acquisition of evidence by illegal means is that not merely evidence so acquired shall not be used before the court but that it shall not be used at all... the rule operates to exclude indirect as well as the direct products of such invasions" reiterating Wong Sun v. United States (1963) 371 U.S. 471. Silverman v. United States 365 U.S. 505 held that testimonial evidence is also excluded if obtained through an unlawful search. 

The standard of proof at a Motion to Suppress Evidence pursuant to Penal Code Section 1538 is by a preponderance of the evidence. People v. James (1977) 19 Cal.3d 99.  In People v. Dickerson (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 645, the Court held that when there is a factual inconsistency in the testimony, yet the testimony on both sides is credible, and there is no warrant, the motion should be granted. 

As a matter of procedure, in misdemeanor cases, a motion to suppress is heard prior to trial. In felony cases, a motion to suppress may be heard at the time of the preliminary hearing or on a date specifically set for the motion to be heard.

MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS - ONE OF THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAYS TO "WIN" YOUR ORANGE COUNTY DUI CASE WITHOUT PROCEEDING TO A JURY TRIAL

One of the most effective ways to win your case without the need to proceed to a trial is through a motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code Section 1538.5. If the motion to suppress is granted, the case will be dismissed regardless of the blood alcohol level. Peter F. Iocona and the DUI Defense Attorneys of The SoCal Law Network have the best record in Orange County for obtaining dismissals of DUI Charges through Motions to Suppress based on any one of the following alleged Vehicle Code Violations:


There are certain exceptions to consider when evaluating the ability to succeed at a motion to suppress hearing. An experienced defense attorney will know how to properly evaluate all of the evidence in order to know best how to proceed in light of these exceptions to the Fourth Amendment: 


Keep in mind that every case is different. While the exceptions may have applied to the facts of those cases, they may not apply to yours; thus making your arrest unlawful and leading to the suppression of the evidence and a dismissal.

If you were arrested at a 
DUI Sobriety Checkpoint, or by officers and/or deputies working as part of a Driving Under the Influence DUI Saturation Patrol/Roving Patrol, there is usually audio and/or video as well, which can be integral pieces to your defense. Additionally, all the law enforcement agencies are required to document that the vehicles stopped at a Sobriety Checkpoint were done by way of a neutral mathematical formula to remove unlawful authority of police officers serving as "greeters" at a checkpoint.


To learn more about Sobriety Checkpoints and DUI Saturation or Roving DUI Patrols, click one of the links below:


Sometimes the driving alone is insufficient to justify a stop and detention; but the "totality of the circumstances" warrants the stop and detention and/or there is an exception that permits the stop and detention.  As a result, one must consider:

We thoroughly review all of the evidence that the government intends to use against you to develop defenses that win. There is no substitute for the experience that these high-powered DUI Defense Attorneys bring to your case and the impact they can have on the outcome of your case.

DIRECTIONS TO PETER F. IOCONA - ATTORNEY AT LAW IN LAGUNA HILLS






















Website Builder