PETER F. IOCONA - ATTORNEY AT LAW
ORANGE COUNTY'S "BEST" DUI LAWYERS

CALL NOW: 949-305-0343 - FREE CONSULTATION - PAYMENT PLANS

California DMV APS Hearings


CONTACT US TODAY


ATTORNEY BIOGRAPHIES


 
CLIENT REVIEWS &
PEER-REVIEW RATINGS



FOLLOW OUR DUI BLOGS


GOOGLE BLOGGER

OC DUI Lawyer Blog


GOOGLE BUSINESS PAGES


PETER F. IOCONA
ATTORNEY AT LAW

22982 LA CADENA DR #239
LAGUNA HILLS, CA. 92653




THE SOCAL LAW NETWORK

23152 VERDUGO DR #201
LAGUNA HILLS, CA. 92653

 



SHARE AND FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:

  


  



ALAN CASTILLO AND PETER F.  IOCONA BOTH SELECTED AS ONE OF ORANGE COUNTY'S TOP-RATED DEFENSE ATTORNEYS

Top-Rated OC DUI Attorney


PETER F. IOCONA: RATED BY "SUPER LAWYERS" 2015-2016


Super Lawyer Rated - Peter F. Iocona


PETER F. IOCONA SELECTED AS ONE OF THE "TOP 100 TRIAL LAWYERS" BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION


Top 100 Trial Lawyers - Peter F. Iocona



PETER F. IOCONA SELECTED AS ONE OF THE TOP CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS





PETER F. IOCONA SELECTED AS ONE OF THE NATION'S TOP ONE PERCENT ATTORNEYS BY N.A.D.C. 


Peter F. Iocona - Top One Percent Rated Attorney


PETER F. IOCONA SELECTED AS A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL ADVOCACY OF DUI DEFENSE


Nationally Ranked Superior DUI Attorney


FEATURED IN THE "TOP 100" MAGAZINE AS ONE OF THE NATION'S TOP 100 LAW FIRMS



 "MEMBER" OF THE CALIFORNIA DUI LAWYERS ASSOCIATION


DUI Defense Lawyer - California DUI Lawyers Association


"MEMBER" OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGE FOR DUI DEFENSE


DUI Lawyer - National College for DUI Defense


"MEMBER" OF THE DUI DEFENSE LAWYERS ASSOCIATION (DUIDLA)


DUI Defense Lawyer - DUIDLA Member

  
ALAN CASTILLO SELECTED AS 
ONE OF THE "TOP 100 TRIAL LAWYERS" BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION



Top 100 Trial Lawyers - Alan Castillo


ALAN CASTILLO SELECTED AS 
ONE OF THE NATION'S TOP ONE PERCENT ATTORNEYS BY N.A.D.C. 


Alan Castillo - Top One Percent Rated Attorney



FORMER CONTRIBUTING EDITORS TO "CALIFORNIA DRUNK DRIVING LAW "
(2003-2016)


California Drunk Driving Law - Contributing Editors (2003-2016)



LAWYER LEGION COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AWARD 


Lawyer Legion - Top Attorney



"LEAD COUNSEL" RATED DEFENSE ATTORNEYS


Lead Counsel Rated Orange County DUI Attorneys



 LAWYER.COM VERIFIED DEFENSE ATTORNEYS





 BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU RATED "A+"


BBB Top Rating - Top-Rated DUI Attorneys



EVERY ATTORNEY IS RATED "10/10" OR "SUPERB" BY AVVO ATTORNEY RATING SERVICE


Peter F. Iocona - Top-Rated Orange County DUI Lawyer

PETER F. IOCONA RATED "SUPERB" "10/10" BY AVVO



Peter F. Iocona - Best Orange County DUI Lawyer

PETER F. IOCONA RECEIVED "CLIENT'S CHOICE AWARD" 
FROM AVVO RATING SERVICE


Peter F. Iocona - Top Orange County DUI Attorney

 PETER F. IOCONA AWARDED 
"TOP CONTRIBUTOR" BY AVVO





ALAN CASTILLO RATED "SUPERB" BY AVVO





 
ALAN CASTILLO RECEIVED "CLIENTS' CHOICE AWARD" 
FROM AVVO RATING SERVICE





 MARLO CORDERO RATED
"SUPERB" BY AVVO

California DMV APS Hearings

RATED BY SUPER LAWYERS, ORANGE COUNTY'S TOP-RATED DUI DEFENSE ATTORNEYS

Peter F. Iocona - Top 100 Trial LawyersPeter F. Iocona - Super Lawyers Rated Orange County DUI Lawyer  Peter F. Iocona - Top-Rated DUI Criminal Defense Attorney
 Peter F. Iocona - Top-Rated Orange County DUI Defense Attorney

DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES APS HEARINGS 

The California Department of Motor Vehicles' Administrative Per Se statutory scheme was created to quickly remove the licenses of those charged with DUI.  Because the action is administrative, the rules of evidence are relaxed. Thus, nearly everything comes in. Also, the case is decided under a preponderance of the evidence standard as opposed to the proof beyond a reasonable standard used in court.  The relaxed evidentiary standards allow the DMV to conduct the hearing without testimony from the arresting officer unless you subpoena the officer or witness to the hearing.
 
Additionally, the case is not decided by a judge or jury, it is decided by an employee of the DMV who serves as both the prosecutor and the judge. While there are some hearing officers who are able to fairly judge these competing points of view, many are unable to do so effectively.  One can imagine that it is difficult to play both the role of the judge and the prosecutor then decide as to whom between the prosecutor and the defense prevailed on the actual issues. The Department bears the presumption, but the DMV APS hearings can be won.
 
In the event one does not prevail at the hearing, there is the possibility of pursuing judicial review by way of a writ of mandate, which is heard by an actual judge.  DMV writs are complicated and, as a result, are often handled only by a group of attorneys who know how to handle these types of cases.  Sometimes these cases continue on to the Court of Appeal or even the California State Supreme Court.


YOU NEED AN EXPERIENCED DMV/DUI DEFENSE ATTORNEY


Click to learn more about California APS Hearings from Attorney Peter F. Iocona, a recognized expert in California DUI Defense and DMV APS Hearings:


AN INTRODUCTION OF THE TYPES OF DMV APS ACTIONS

There are several grounds for a person to be served with an Administrative Per Se Suspension (APS) Order—They are as follows:

Drives with a 0.01% or higher BAC while under 21 years of age. VC § 13353.2(a)(2).

Drives with a 0.01% or higher BAC while on DUI Probation. VC §§ 23154 and 13353.2(a)(4).

Drives with a 0.04% or higher in a commercial vehicle. VC §§ 13557(b)(2)(C)(iv) and 13353.2(a)(3).

Drives with a 0.08% or higher BAC. VC § 13353.2(a)(1).

Refuses to submit to or complete a chemical test pursuant to VC § 13353, or P.A.S. (“Preliminary Alcohol Screening”) test if under 21 or then on DUI probation pursuant to VC § 13353.1



AN OVERVIEW OF THE "ADMIN PER SE" HEARING ISSUES


The DMV must prove the following issues as a standard "Admin Per Se" hearing:

  1. That the peace officer had reasonable cause to believe that the person had been driving a motor vehicle in violation of CVC §§ 23136, 23140, 23152 and/or 23153
  2. That the person was lawfully arrested or detained;
  3. That the person was driving under any of the following circumstances:
    1. The person had a BAC of 0.08% or higher if over the age of 21;
    2. The person had a BAC of 0.01% or higher if under the age of 21 as measured by a preliminary alcohol screening test (PAS) or any other form of chemical testing;
    3. The person had a BAC of 0.01% or higher while on probation for a prior DUI conviction
See: CVC §§ 13558(c)(2); 13557(b)(2) and 23154.  



AN OVERVIEW OF THE "REFUSAL" HEARING ISSUES



The DMV must prove the following issues at a chemical test refusal hearing:

    1. The peace officer had reasonable cause to believe that the person had been driving a motor vehicle in violation of CVC §§23136, 23140, 23154 (effective 1/1/09), 23152, or 23153;
    2. The person was placed under arrest or, if the alleged violation was of CVC §§23136, 23140, or 23154 (effective 1/1/09), the person was lawfully detained;
    3. The person was advised that a refusal would result in a suspension or revocation of the driving privilege; and
    4. The person refused or failed to complete the chemical test or tests after being requested to do so by a peace officer.

See: CVC § 13558(c)(1).


ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE HEARING PENALTIES 


For a first offense Orange County DUI, the licensee is exposed to a four (4) month administrative suspension that can be modified to a license restriction after thirty (30) days of hard suspension, which means no driving whatsoever.  Thereafter the licensee is on a restriction for a period of five months.
 
For a second and third offenses, the license is exposed to a one year suspension that is able to be modified to a ignition interlock device (IID) restriction after 90 days on a second offense DUI and after six (6) months on a third offense; but the ability to qualify for the driver's license restriction is based on a conviction for DUI, not the administrative suspension action alone.
 
A licensee is unable to qualify for an IID restriction if they are found to have refused to submit to a chemical test or the blood test had to be forced. The hearing is significantly more important as a first offense refusal exposes a licensee to a one year revocation and a second or third offense refusal results in a minimum two year revocation.
 
The DMV APS hearing has additional significance.  It gives the Orange County DUI Attorney the ability to conduct a preliminary work-up of the case and determine if a witness or witnesses should be subpoenaed, such as the arresting officer and/or other witnesses.  These issues are later used in court at the OC DUI trial.


REFUSAL ALLEGATIONS AT DMV AND COURT

Refusals are the most difficult cases to defend at the DMV, and as such, oftentimes result in the need to take a writ of mandate to obtain justice. The defenses to a refusal are limited based on over 40 years of case law.  You need an attorney who is skilled in defending these types of allegations.

To learn more about DMV APS Hearings based on a presentation presented by Peter F. Iocona of The SoCal Law Network click the link below to learn more about each of the topics presented in the title. This presentation has been given to DUI Lawyers throughout the State of California and are being provided to our visitors via this website.

DMV APS Hearings - An Overview of DMV APS Hearing Actions DMV APS Hearings - Examining the Issues & Sub-Issues


DIRECTIONS TO PETER F. IOCONA - ATTORNEY AT LAW IN LAGUNA HILLS






















Website Builder